Thinking “Infinitesimally”

1. SO I’d like to reiterate the intuitive picture one should have when working with calculus. We should think of a differential \mathrm{d}x as a “really small” change in x…well, it’s the “smallest” possible change!

The reason I bring this up, well, just to reiterate the point when we consider y=f(x) graphed in a neighborhood x_{0}-\Delta x\leq x\leq x_{0}+\Delta x, as \Delta x gets smaller…the curve more closely resembles a line. This is the tangent line to the point (x_{0},f(x_{0})).

Mixing notations, if y=f(x), we obtain the differential quantity \mathrm{d}y = f'(x)\,\mathrm{d}x. The intuition should be: when I look at the “microscopic” scale, the curve “behaves linearly.”

2. Example. Lets consider the sine function. The linear approximation near x=0 would be t(x)=x. So if we plot the sine function in light blue, the approximation dashed in red, for values of x between -\pi/4\leq x\leq\pi/4, we have the following graph:

sin(x) for -pi/4<x<pi/4

Observe the linear approximation begins to differ from the actual function near the boundaries of the domain.

Look, we can even consider the area between these curves! We see this is the cumulative error, and it is
(1)\displaystyle E = \int^{\pi/4}_{0}\bigl(\sin(x)-x\bigr)\,\mathrm{d}x = \left.-\cos(x)-\frac{x^{2}}{2}\right|^{\pi/4}_{0}
Evaluating the limits gives us
(2)\displaystyle E = \frac{-\sqrt{2}}{2}-\frac{\pi^{2}}{32}+1\approx -0.0155319187
This is just for the values of x\geq0. We double this quantity to get the total error of our approximation, in the sense that this describes the area between the two curves.

3. If we “zoom in” more, considering the domain -\pi/8\leq x\leq\pi/8, then our graph becomes

sin(x) for -pi/4<x<pi/4

The cumulative error in this case becomes
(3)\displaystyle E = -\cos(\pi/8)-\frac{\pi^{2}}{128}+1\approx -0.000985817
Observe our linear approximation now works better than before! Since the error is greatest at the boundary, we see
(4)\displaystyle \sin(\pi/4)-\pi/4\approx 0.078291 and \displaystyle \sin(\pi/8)-\pi/8\approx 0.010015
The punchline is: as we zoom in closer and closer to the curve, it appears to more and more resemble a line.

4. Microscopic versus Macroscopic. If we consider quantities \mathrm{d}x as “microscopic”, then what’s a “macroscopic” quantity? It’s simply a finite number, i.e., one without “\mathrm{d}”s of any sort.

Advertisements

About Alex Nelson

I like math. I like programming. Most of all, I love puzzles.
This entry was posted in Calculus, Differential and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Thinking “Infinitesimally”

  1. Pingback: [Index] Calculus of a Single Variable | My Math Blog

  2. Pingback: [Index] Calculus in a Single Variable | My Math Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s